Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Planning Commission denies permit for off‑sale alcohol at Laurel West Shopping Center

November 24, 2025 | Salinas, Monterey County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Planning Commission denies permit for off‑sale alcohol at Laurel West Shopping Center
The Salinas Planning Commission on Nov. 19 denied a conditional use permit that would have allowed a proposed convenience store at Laurel West Shopping Center to sell beer, wine and distilled spirits.

Senior planner Tom Wiles told the commission the applicant, Simon Amaida, proposed a 2,618‑square‑foot tenant space converting an existing smoke shop into the Clink Liquor Store. Staff noted the site is in Census Tract 1802, where California Alcohol Beverage Control rules allow five off‑sale licenses; six are active now and approval would have raised the total to seven, a level staff called an "undue concentration" requiring a planning commission finding.

Commissioners who opposed the project pointed to the store’s proximity to a school, the close clustering of alcohol retailers within the census tract and recent local traffic and pedestrian accidents. "There's too many DUIs. There's too many accidents," Commissioner Rock said, urging denial on the basis that public convenience or necessity was not demonstrated. Sergeant Gerardo Magana of the Salinas Police Department said he had "no objection" to the CUP provided the police department’s recommended conditions were incorporated, and he offered to provide district DUI statistics on request. Magana reported district crime numbers slightly above the city average and said the change "may or may not increase cost for service for the police."

Staff said proposed hours of operation would be 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. and that alcohol coolers would be locked between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. The staff report cited CEQA §15061(b)(3) and recommended approval with conditions and findings; commissioners instead directed staff to prepare a denial resolution reflecting reasons for the decision.

On a roll call the motion to deny carried with votes recorded as: Commissioner Rokomura — No; Commissioner Meeks — Yes; Commissioner Rook — Yes; Commissioner Purnell — Yes; Chairperson Makayla Dade — No. The commission asked staff to include in the denial resolution the record statements citing undue concentration, proximity to a school and public‑safety concerns. The denial becomes effective after a 10‑day appeal period; appeals are filed with the Community Development Department.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal