Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Kootenai County approves position conversion in Prosecuting Attorney's Office to improve recruitment

December 04, 2025 | Kootenai County, Idaho


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Kootenai County approves position conversion in Prosecuting Attorney's Office to improve recruitment
Kootenai County commissioners voted Dec. 4 to approve a position conversion within the Prosecuting Attorney's Office intended to make a vacant civil attorney post more marketable to applicants.

Prosecuting Attorney Stanley Mortensen told the board a civil attorney position classified as an "84" has been vacant since June and that he has interviewed candidates but received no hires. He asked to swap funding/classification between that civil 84 and an 85 criminal slot so the civil vacancy would be funded at the higher 85 level. "I just wasn't getting quality applications," Mortensen said, describing the swap as "horse trading" within his office to attract higher‑caliber candidates.

Mortensen provided pay‑matrix figures during the discussion, citing a starting salary of about $91,000 for an Attorney 4 and about $110,000 for an Attorney 5 (a roughly $17,000 to $22,000 difference depending on which point in the matrix is used); he also cited top‑end figures of about $132,000 and $159,000 and referenced midpoint comparisons. He told the board onboarding costs would be similar regardless of classification because desks, computers and other equipment are already in place.

A commissioner asked whether the office could advertise a salary range to attract candidates and then seek board approval for a higher pay offer if needed; Mortensen said he had been told the conversion needed to come before the board rather than being handled internally. The motion to approve the position conversion was made, seconded and carried with both commissioners voting "Aye."

The conversion was presented as budget neutral (swapping funded slots rather than adding new positions); the board did not approve an ongoing increase in headcount, but approved the reclassification to aid recruitment.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee