Commissioner Hollington confirmed he could view meeting materials remotely and asked whether he should present the item, saying, “I can see it perfectly.”

An unidentified speaker told the commission that no salary change had been proposed for the program in question and that they had therefore implemented no salary adjustment: “as salary by no change was suggested to me, so that's what I did.” The same speaker said benefits remain unsettled because the operation is still ramping up and that they may adjust benefits later, asking the commissioners for direction.

On outreach spending, the speaker said public-notice funding had been reduced in response to lower activity compared with the prior year. “So I kind of scaled it back from 1,600 to 1000 because we're only at, like, 700 right now, and we don't have very many months left to go in the year,” the speaker said, describing the calculation behind the cut.

After private discussion with several commissioners, the speaker reported a collective comfort level with a $30,000 allocation: “with 30,000.” The meeting record provided no formal motion or vote on these items during the segment reviewed.

No statutes, ordinances or formal resolutions were cited in the discussion, and no formal action or direction to staff was recorded in the available transcript excerpt. The conversation focused on short-term budgeting choices — salary maintenance, unsettled benefits, and reduced public-notice spending — with commissioners asked to provide guidance before any final decisions are made.