Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

New Hanover County opposes Fuquay Varina interbasin transfer request, asks for more local hearings

November 18, 2025 | New Hanover County, North Carolina


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

New Hanover County opposes Fuquay Varina interbasin transfer request, asks for more local hearings
The New Hanover County Board of Commissioners voted to oppose the town of Fuquay Varina’s interbasin transfer (IBT) certificate request and its draft environmental impact statement (DEIS), adopting a resolution that asks the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission and DEQ to extend comment deadlines and hold an additional public hearing in New Hanover County.

The resolution recounts that Fuquay Varina submitted a notice of intent in 2020 and later released a DEIS identifying a preferred alternative to transfer approximately 6,170,000 gallons per day from the Cape Fear River Basin to the Neuse River Basin (the DEIS describes an average-day transfer and a maximum-day scenario). The board said the DEIS did not account for return flows to the Cape Fear Basin and that the hearing locations (Fayetteville, Raleigh, Pittsboro) make public participation difficult for impacted Cape Fear utilities.

The board requested that the EMC/DEQ allow additional time for Cape Fear Basin utilities (including Cape Fear Public Utility Authority, Brunswick County, Pender County, and Lower Cape Fear Water and Sewer Authority) to review and comment, and urged a fourth hearing in New Hanover County during December 2025 so impacted residents and utilities can attend.

After the reading, several commissioners emphasized drought vulnerability, impacts for farmers and downstream users, and the possibility that transfers could concentrate contaminants such as PFAS downstream. The resolution was moved, seconded, and approved by voice vote.

The board characterized the action as an advocacy step to ensure adequate notice and local participation in a process that could affect regional water supplies.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep North Carolina articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI