Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Glendora council votes to join Supreme Court amicus brief and approves $15,000 retention bonus

November 17, 2025 | Glendora, Los Angeles County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Glendora council votes to join Supreme Court amicus brief and approves $15,000 retention bonus
The Glendora City Council voted unanimously on Nov. 12 to join as amicus curiae in a petition for review to the California Supreme Court in Commune DTLA LLC v. City of Redondo Beach (case No. B336042) and authorized a one‑time $15,000 retention bonus for the city manager.

City Attorney Jamie reported out after the closed session that the council had reviewed three items: a public‑employee performance evaluation, labor negotiations related to the city manager, and the newly added urgency item concerning whether the city should join the friend‑of‑the‑court brief. "The city council approved a 5‑0 vote to join that friend of the brief action," Jamie said during the report out. The attorney also said a future contract amendment related to the city manager would be brought to a regular agenda and that the bonus had been approved.

The closed session had been added at the start of the meeting as an urgency item; Mayor David Friedendahl asked for the addition and the motion to include it was made and seconded during the opening business. Councilmembers did not debate the reportable outcomes at length during the public meeting. The council also reported there was no reportable action on the city manager’s evaluation beyond the personnel steps described.

The amicus decision and the personnel direction were taken under the authority cited during the closed session notice (government code sections referenced in the meeting for closed‑session authority). The council did not provide additional written analysis in the public meeting about the legal reasoning for joining the amicus brief; the transcript records only the council’s vote and the case name.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal