Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Budget committee approves multiple provisos and restorations; full bill postponed for technical fixes

November 15, 2025 | Seattle, King County, Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Budget committee approves multiple provisos and restorations; full bill postponed for technical fixes
The Seattle Select Budget Committee took votes on a mix of citywide and district-specific budget amendments on Nov. 14, approving several items and rejecting others. Because many items were stand-alone provisos or restorations, the committee produced multiple roll-call outcomes that will be reflected in council bill 121116 when it returns for final review.

Key approvals and outcomes

- SDCI 6a (tenant services restoration): Passed. The committee added $400,000 to SDCI to help restore tenant services funding targeted to legal assistance, clinics and tenant counseling. Vote: 7 yes, 2 abstentions.

- MO5 a1 (Unified Care Team proviso): Passed. The committee placed provisos intended to preserve nearly $30 million across seven departments to sustain Unified Care Team outreach and coordination. Vote: 6 yes, 1 no, 2 abstentions.

- OH02b (targeted rental assistance for OH-funded providers): Passed. The committee added $6,000,000 targeted to rental-assistance/operating stabilization for affordable-housing providers in OH-funded buildings, to complement a separate $28M RFP. Vote: 7 yes, 2 no.

- SDOT 2b1 (pothole repair funding restriction): Passed. The committee restricted $4.3M in SDOT funding to the pothole-repair program. Vote recorded in committee.

- SPR 17a1 (prefabricated restrooms for District 1 and study): Passed. The committee approved a $1.1M package to enable installation of vandal-resistant freestanding restrooms in District 1 and a $100,000 study on citywide models. Vote: 6 yes, 3 no.

- LAW 2a (city attorney drug-diversion proviso): Passed (7 yes, 2 abstain). The council preserved $289,000 to support a municipal-level drug diversion alternative (staff and legal assistant) connecting defendants to the Municipal Court Resource Center.

- SDOT 51a (downtown activation cleaning / SDOT portion): Passed; added to the bill to preserve downtown activation resources.

- OED 19a (Liberty Project small-business support): Passed. Committee attached an ongoing $500,000 appropriation for the Liberty Project (UW/Tabor100 partnership serving small businesses, primarily Black-owned) to the budget bill. Chair acknowledged this was a late walk-on but central staff confirmed funding was intended to be ongoing.

Notable failures and procedural notes

- Roxbury design proviso (SDOT 003 b1): Failed (3 yes, 6 no).

- Admiral Way safety proviso (SDOT 017 a1): Failed (3 yes, 6 no).

- SDOT micro-mobility corrals (SDOT 31 a1): Failed (3 yes, 4 no, 2 abstain).

Next steps: The committee postponed final passage of council bill 121116 until Nov. 20 to allow central staff to incorporate the approved amendments and correct technical items; no substantive funding changes are allowed at the Nov. 20 session, per the chair.

Vote record summary (select items):
- HSD 82b (Kettle reduction): 7-2 (passed)
- HSD 82a as amended: passed (1 abstention)
- SDCI 6a: 7 yes, 2 abstain (passed)
- HSD 57a1: 5 yes, 3 no, 1 abstain (passed)
- MO5 a1: 6 yes, 1 no, 2 abstain (passed)
- OED 14a1 (business district support): 6 yes, 3 no (passed)
- OH02b: 7 yes, 2 no (passed)
- SPR 17a1: 6 yes, 3 no (passed)
- LAW 2a: 7 yes, 2 abstain (passed)
- SDOT 31 a1 (corrals): 3 yes, 4 no, 2 abstain (failed)
- OED 19a (Liberty Project): 8 yes, 0 no, 1 abstain (passed)

Why it matters: The votes preserve funding for tenants, outreach teams, rental-assistance stabilization for affordable-housing providers, downtown cleaning and small-business technical assistance while rejecting several district-targeted capital provisos. The committee explicitly delayed the bill's final passage to ensure technical accuracy and to allow additional staff follow-up.

Sources: Committee presentations by central staff and department directors; roll-call votes recorded by the clerk.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Washington articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI