Following concerns raised at a recent special town meeting, the Select Board opened a broad discussion on Nov. 4 about how to proceed with a governance and bylaws study (Article 10). Board members debated options that included (1) electing committee members by ballot, (2) having advisory identify and recommend members to town meeting for ratification, or (3) appointing a select‑board‑sponsored committee. Several members expressed a desire to avoid perceptions that the Select Board had placed its "thumb on the scale" by unilaterally appointing a group.

Participants discussed sequencing: several Select Board members suggested obtaining independent consultant cost estimates and background research so an advisory committee or a town‑elected panel could begin work with shared baseline materials. Some members preferred that the eventual committee be selected by town meeting or a ballot to increase perceived independence; others said advisory or select‑board appointment with clear charge and limits could work.

No binding vote was taken to form a committee on Nov. 4, but the board authorized staff to gather ballpark consultant cost estimates and to return with options on committee composition (appointed vs. elected) and a scope of work that could be funded at a future town meeting. Several members emphasized they want the study to be narrowly scoped and to avoid immediate operational actions until the town has independent analysis and public vetting.

The board also discussed related operational reviews (staffing, departmental organization and potential efficiency measures) and whether consultant work should focus on structural options, implementation planning, or both.