Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Dickinson amends municipal code to clarify homeschools aren’t treated as 'schools' for animal-keeping rule; vote 4–1

November 05, 2025 | Dickinson City, Stark County, North Dakota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Dickinson amends municipal code to clarify homeschools aren’t treated as 'schools' for animal-keeping rule; vote 4–1
The Dickinson City Commission on Nov. 4 adopted Ordinance 18-39 to amend section 6-81 of the municipal code so that, for the chapter 6 animal-keeping provision, "school does not include a homeschool operating out of a private residence." The change was presented by City Attorney Wenco during a public hearing and approved by a 4–1 vote.

Wenco told the commission the clarification responds to enforcement questions that arose where chapter 6 (animal-keeping) and chapter 62 (zoning) did not define "school" in a way that addresses homeschools. Wenco said the intent is to make enforcement "unequivocally clear" that private-residence homeschools are not included in the typical sense of a school such as Dickinson High School, Trinity High School or Dickinson State University.

Wenco also emphasized the amendment does not authorize keeping chickens or domestic fowl in the city: "We are not authorizing chickens in the city of Dickinson. That's not what this does. We are just going one step farther in clarifying that chickens are not allowed in a homeschool type of situation or arrangement." The ordinance keeps existing exclusions in place (for example, certain animals or uses already excluded by other provisions).

Commissioner Riddle cast the lone no vote and stated on the record: "As being a member of the homeschool community, I vote no for segregating homeschool from school." Commissioners Bair, Murphy and Frederick voted to adopt the ordinance; the chair also voted aye.

The ordinance directs staff to update enforcement guidance and public-facing code language. Wenco and staff reiterated that any service-animal or ADA-related exemption would be handled separately under federal law and would require documentation.

Because this item was considered through a public hearing and produced a recorded dissent, staff flagged an action item to update enforcement guidance and public notices to reflect the clarified definition.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep North Dakota articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI