Council members spent an extended portion of the meeting discussing a letter and a seven-question checklist from Downtown Lock Haven asking how the organization could be integrated under another entity's umbrella.

Several councilors expressed support for continued collaboration and for preparing a staff response, while others cautioned that bringing the nonprofit formally under the city's umbrella could erode its fundraising ability and create expectations that municipal tax dollars would cover downtown programs. Concerns included the downtown organization's existing budget structure, the manager position's sustainability and whether city oversight could deter private donations.

City staff (Casey and Abby referenced in the transcript) told council they could prepare an editable narrative and answers to the seven questions that Downtown Lock Haven can review. The staff response would incorporate models used by other municipalities where downtown organizations operate with city support but retain distinct governance.

Council then voted to have staff prepare the requested response and to invite Downtown Lock Haven's executive board and other partners to a follow-up conversation; the motion specified that staff would draft the narrative so Downtown Lock Haven's board could edit it rather than committing city staff to an automatic takeover.

Why it matters

Downtown Lock Haven carries out events, grant work and business coordination concentrated in the city's central business district; how it is governed affects downtown event programming, fundraising and the city's relationship with merchants. Council members emphasized they want to support the downtown organization while protecting the city from perceived conflicts of interest or assumptions that municipal tax dollars will supplant private fundraising.

What comes next

Staff were asked to draft the narrative answering Downtown Lock Haven's questions and to propose a meeting with the downtown executive board and other partners. The council did not approve any formal transfer of governance or budget changes during the meeting.