This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the
video of the full meeting.
Please report any errors so we can fix them.
Report an error »
The Board of Commissioners discussed options for selecting Chatham County’s next county attorney following notice from the current lead attorney that he plans to shift roles at his firm.
County Manager Brian Thompson summarized four options: (1) continue with the current outside firm (Pointer‒Spruill) and identify a successor attorney within the firm; (2) issue a request for proposals and go to market; (3) recruit and hire an in-house staff attorney to serve as county counsel; or (4) adopt a hybrid model that combines a staff attorney with an external retainer for specialized matters.
Pointer‒Spruill’s Bob Hageman told the board the firm has a deep bench and would be willing to help with transition work; he said the engagement letter identifies a principal attorney who works with the county and that the firm could provide experienced attorneys with land-use and local-government expertise. Hageman and staff named two Pointer‒Spruill attorneys who could serve in the county-attorney role: Evan Lee (senior associate doing much day-to-day work with staff) and Emily Meeker (a partner the firm suggested for the principal role). The firm said Hageman would remain available as ‘‘of counsel’’ and could assist in transition work in a more limited capacity.
Several commissioners said they value the existing relationship with Pointer‒Spruill and recommended starting by interviewing firm candidates — with a fallback to issue an RFP if interviews do not produce a satisfactory fit. The board agreed to invite the Pointer‒Spruill candidates to meet commissioners in closed session on Nov. 17 so commissioners can evaluate fit and experience. Staff was asked to provide bios and contact information and to prepare budgetary impacts for each option in time for upcoming budget discussions.
Legal authority: staff noted General Statute 153A‑114, which requires board appointment of a county attorney and that the attorney be licensed to practice in North Carolina; the board must appoint an attorney in open session by majority vote when it takes that formal step.
No formal appointment was made on Nov. 3; the board directed staff to arrange candidate meetings and gather additional information.
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Search every word spoken in city, county, state, and federal meetings. Receive real-time
civic alerts,
and access transcripts, exports, and saved lists—all in one place.
Gain exclusive insights
Get our premium newsletter with trusted coverage and actionable briefings tailored to
your community.
Shape the future
Help strengthen government accountability nationwide through your engagement and
feedback.
Risk-Free Guarantee
Try it for 30 days. Love it—or get a full refund, no questions asked.
Secure checkout. Private by design.
⚡ Only 8,065 of 10,000 founding memberships remaining
Explore Citizen Portal for free.
Read articles and experience transparency in action—no credit card
required.
Upgrade anytime. Your free account never expires.
What Members Are Saying
"Citizen Portal keeps me up to date on local decisions
without wading through hours of meetings."
— Sarah M., Founder
"It's like having a civic newsroom on demand."
— Jonathan D., Community Advocate
Secure checkout • Privacy-first • Refund within 30 days if not a fit