Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Council refers disputed property-lien matter involving Marks to Public Works Committee

October 31, 2025 | Los Angeles City, Los Angeles County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Council refers disputed property-lien matter involving Marks to Public Works Committee
Councilman Pacheco on Oct. 3 asked the City Council to examine a city lien and deed issue affecting property purchased by Lee Marks. The city attorney advised the council that under municipal code the Department of Public Works must file and record the deed as a ministerial action and that, in the city attorney’s view, the council does not have jurisdiction to stop that ministerial recording.

Pacheco said his office and the city attorney had discussed the property and that, because of legal impediments, the appropriate next step was a referral to the Public Works Committee so staff and councilmembers could investigate possible equitable resolutions. Pacheco moved to refer the matter; the chair ordered the referral with no objection. Several council members used the discussion to raise a broader policy problem: liens assessed for demolition and abatement can exceed a property’s market value, creating disincentives for redevelopment and complicating foreclosure outcomes.

Councilman Nick Hernandez described examples of prior demolitions where liens exceeded property values and urged the committee to consider whether state legislation or a city policy change is needed to prevent loss of city assessments in tax-lien foreclosures. Councilman Berensen cautioned against ad hoc concessions that could constitute a gift of public funds; Holden and others called for procedural safeguards and clearer notice in lien/auction processes.

The council’s action was to refer the item to the Public Works Committee so staff can review the legal options and explore potential compromises or policy changes; the chair instructed the committee to act expeditiously.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal