This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the
video of the full meeting.
Please report any errors so we can fix them.
Report an error »
Laguna Beach — The Design Review Board continued action on a proposed new single‑family home at 1425 Morningside Drive to its December meeting after neighbors expressed concerns about potential loss of ocean views and the board indicated changes to the building footprint could preserve neighboring sight lines.
Applicant architect Denise Saguarakis presented a two‑story Spanish‑style design the owners said reflects neighborhood scale; staff’s presentation included an analysis showing the proposed livable‑area ratio is consistent with the block average. The set of design revisions submitted during the hearing reduced upper‑level massing and aligned the structure with neighboring ridge lines. The most vocal public comment came from an adjacent neighbor, Brian Jenison, who said the current layout would remove a large portion of his view corridor from his kitchen and family room areas and urged the applicant to reduce the house footprint or seek a variance to retain more of his view.
Board members noted the lot’s topography and the applicant’s stated program create tension between the owner’s development rights and the adjacent property’s view equity. Several board members told the applicant they would prefer either a modest pullback of the house corner near the neighbor’s view line or that the applicant pursue a variance so the design could be reconciled with neighboring string lines. After discussing scheduling and the time needed for a thoughtful response, the board voted to continue the item to the December 11 hearing and set an internal resubmittal deadline of October 22 so staff can circulate revised plans to reviewers and neighbors in advance.
What’s next: The applicant may revise the design (or pursue a variance) and resubmit by October 22 for inclusion on the December 11 agenda. The board chair asked the applicant to consider modest reductions of the corner nearest the neighbor while preserving program where possible; the applicant said their preference was to avoid a redesign and to attempt a landscape-based or minor plan adjustment, but accepted the continuance.
Votes and logistics: The motion to continue was seconded and passed on a unanimous roll call. The board asked staff to include stakeholder outreach results in the resubmittal packet.
View full meeting
This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.
Search every word spoken in city, county, state, and federal meetings. Receive real-time
civic alerts,
and access transcripts, exports, and saved lists—all in one place.
Gain exclusive insights
Get our premium newsletter with trusted coverage and actionable briefings tailored to
your community.
Shape the future
Help strengthen government accountability nationwide through your engagement and
feedback.
Risk-Free Guarantee
Try it for 30 days. Love it—or get a full refund, no questions asked.
Secure checkout. Private by design.
⚡ Only 8,224 of 10,000 founding memberships remaining
Explore Citizen Portal for free.
Read articles, watch selected videos, and experience transparency in action—no credit card
required.
Upgrade anytime. Your free account never expires.
What Members Are Saying
"Citizen Portal keeps me up to date on local decisions
without wading through hours of meetings."
— Sarah M., Founder
"It's like having a civic newsroom on demand."
— Jonathan D., Community Advocate
Secure checkout • Privacy-first • Refund in 30 days if not a fit