The Lago Vista Charter Review Committee spent significant time parsing a Rockport, Texas, charter used as a model, drawing particular attention to its annexation and disannexation language and how much regulatory detail the charter embeds.

Committee members noted Rockport’s provision allowing newly annexed territory to petition for disannexation “after two and a half years” if specified services are not provided. Robert Owen said he had not seen that clause in other charters and speculated it might respond to legal complaints or litigation. Paul Prince and others questioned whether the charter should restate specific statutory text or simply refer to state law; several members favored general references to state law to avoid locking in citations that may change.

Members also flagged Rockport language requiring the comprehensive plan committee to hold at least one joint meeting with the city council. Committee members said that matched recent local practice and could be useful to codify. The committee discussed that Rockport’s planning-and-zoning section contained detailed procedural and substantive provisions some members felt belonged in ordinance or rules rather than in the charter.

Committee members asked staff to track where the model charter explicitly cites the Texas Government Code and to note sections the Lago Vista committee might adopt or omit.