Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Patient With Rare Cancer Urges Lawmakers to Restore Copay Assistance Exceptions for Specialty Drugs

October 01, 2025 | 2025 Legislature MA, Massachusetts


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Patient With Rare Cancer Urges Lawmakers to Restore Copay Assistance Exceptions for Specialty Drugs
Kathleen Demarest of East Long Meadow told the Joint Committee on Financial Services she was diagnosed with a rare, incurable pancreatic cancer and that a state rule recently removed her access to copay assistance for a specialty drug (Lanreotide). She said the removal occurred because a generic was recorded as available in state records even though distribution issues meant the generic would not be available for months.

Demarest described being notified that the state would no longer allow her co‑pay assistance and said she faced a sudden increase in out‑of‑pocket cost to about $1,200 a month. She asked committee members to consider exceptions for patients currently on therapies and to review the state’s process for determining generic availability and the timing of enforcement.

“I was baffled and angry. How could the state of Massachusetts just decide to not let a private company pay for my copay?” Demarest said. She thanked Representative Brian Ashe’s office for helping her navigate the process and asked the committee for an opportunity to provide more detailed case information.

Committee members did not offer a formal response during the hearing. Demarest said the law that led to the change was adopted in 2012 and noted that Massachusetts’ approach differs from other states with similar statutes.

Why it matters: the testimony highlights how administrative determinations about drug availability and enforcement of copay assistance rules can produce immediate, significant financial burdens for patients on specialty therapies.

No committee action was taken on the matter at the hearing.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Massachusetts articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI