The Greenwood Board of Zoning Appeals on Oct. 13 granted three variances that allow an existing privacy fence at 202 West Whiteman Street to remain despite Unified Development Ordinance standards.

Petitioner Catherine Woodward told the board the fence protects privacy and safety for family members and pets and that the fence had been in place prior to her purchase of the house. Woodward said the fence helps with “safety, privacy, and property security” for the corner lot and that it also supports family use of the backyard.

Staff noted the fence does not meet code and recommended denial of fences that do not comply with ordinance standards. The board heard neighbor input reflected in the record indicating the fence’s appearance and placement had received positive feedback.

After considering the statutory criteria, the board approved three requests, each without conditions:
• Allow a fence within 2 feet of the sidewalk — motion by Mr. King, second by Mr. Moll; vote 5-0.
• Allow a fence up to 6 feet in height in the front yard — motion by Mr. King, second by Mr. Moll; vote 5-0.
• Allow a fence in a front yard to be less than 50% transparent — motion by Mr. Moll, second by Mr. Millborn; vote 5-0.

The board then directed the corporation counsel to draft written findings of fact reflecting the board’s decision on variance petition VCA2025-026 for consideration and adoption at the next meeting. The petitioner was told she need not attend the next meeting for the final adoption of the findings.

Why it matters: The rulings formally allow the existing privacy fence to remain despite standard transparency and setback requirements in the Unified Development Ordinance, resolving a zoning conflict for the corner property.

The board’s approval was unanimous; the written findings will be prepared by counsel and returned to the board at its next meeting for formal adoption.