The Will County Board on Wednesday adopted resolution 25-3117 declaring the county’s commitment that residents “can live and work without fear,” urging state and federal partners to strengthen transparency and accountability in immigration enforcement after reports of enforcement activity in local settings prompted concern.

The resolution as adopted urges state and federal leaders to adopt transparency and accountability measures and affirms the county’s support for due-process protections. A proposed amendment to add a sentence requiring Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers operating in Illinois to “visibly identify themselves and refrain from wearing masks or face coverings except where medically necessary” was moved, debated and then partially modified by the board before the full resolution vote.

The amendment process and debate
During debate, members expressed sharply different views. Supporters said the resolution responds to reported enforcement actions that left residents and courthouse users fearful and that asking for transparent, identifiable enforcement practices is a values-based call for due process and public trust. One proponent said the Fifth Amendment’s due-process guarantee applies to “no person” and urged the board to act to protect constitutional protections for everyone on U.S. soil.

Opponents said local government should not direct federal agency operations, argued some claims cited in the resolution were unproven in the record, and warned the measure could be politically inflammatory. Several board members said they wanted fully documented evidence of the incidents alleged in the resolution and questioned factual statements in early draft language about criminal-conviction rates among people in ICE custody.

A roll-call hand vote approved a limited change to the proposed amendment (several members voted both for and against elements during roll calls recorded in the meeting); after further discussion the board voted to adopt the full resolution as amended.

How the board voted
The meeting record shows a series of votes during the amendment and final-resolution process. The amendment’s partial removal passed on a roll call; the final resolution passed on a roll call with the following recorded votes: Member Berkowitz — No; Member Brooks — Yes; Member Bullock — Yes; Member Butler — No; Member Hickey — Yes; Member Ortiz — Yes. (Members not listed in the roll call were not shown in the excerpted roll-call portion.)

What the resolution asks for
The full resolution asks that Will County reaffirm due process and basic protections, urge transparency and accountability in enforcement activities that occur within the county, and request that state and federal partners take actions to protect court access, public-safety reporting and public trust. The resolution does not create county enforcement powers or orders; it is a policy statement urging higher-level partners to act.

Board reaction and next steps
Board members who supported the resolution said fear of enforcement can deter people from contacting police, going to hospitals, or attending court; supporters argued that discouraging cooperation with public institutions can reduce community safety. Members who opposed the resolution said concerns raised should be investigated and substantiated before adopting a public policy statement.

The resolution directs county staff to share the board’s statement with relevant state and federal officials and to request clarification about the incidents referenced so the county has a documented record for any follow-up.

Ending: The board adopted 25-3117 after extended debate and narrowly recorded votes on amendment language and the final measure; staff will relay the county’s statement to state and federal partners and seek additional information on the reported incidents referenced during the debate.