The Bayonne City Planning Board at its October meeting approved extension requests for multiple development applications, ratified a minor‑subdivision subcommittee action, and carried several public hearings to later agenda dates.

The board approved extension requests and corresponding resolutions for the following applications: Woodmont Bayonne Phase 2 Urban Renewal LLC (extension through Sept. 13, 2026; site listed as 7 West 50 Second Street, Block 37, Lot 1); BCP LLC (PD‑20‑022) for Second Street right‑of‑way off Avenue A (extension through Oct. 28, 2026); BCP LLC (PD‑20‑023) for 796–804 Avenue E (extension through Oct. 28, 2026); and BHA Oak Street Development (PD‑22‑020) for 7 Oak Court West (extension through Aug. 9, 2026). Each resolution was moved, seconded and approved on roll‑call votes with Chairperson Fiamonte, Vice Chair Vilardo and Commissioners Veloz, Booker, Locke and Rhodes voting aye.

The board also noted an informational minor subdivision (P‑25‑013) involving the Port Terminal Boulevard parcels and recorded that the minor‑subcommittee had voted in favor of authorizing the subdivision; the board ratified that subcommittee action.

Several agenda items were carried or adjourned. The presentation of an amendment to the Peninsula at Bayonne Harbor Station North redevelopment plan (P‑25‑024) was carried to the November 3 calendar without further notice. The application known as P‑25‑017 (Baron Roofing, 104–108 West Seventh Street) was carried to Dec. 9, 2025 without further notice. An application from Abacaras Realty LLC (9–11 Schuyler Place, Block 289, Lot 5) seeking demolition, a minor subdivision and construction of new two‑family dwellings was adjourned to the Dec. 9 meeting after the applicant requested more time to address points in the planning report.

The board forewent adopting minutes from the prior meeting and took a short recess during the hearing for the Abacaras Realty matter. Members of the public asked one procedural question about whether a property is listed as a one‑ or two‑family dwelling on the municipal tax rolls; the board directed the speaker to the tax assessor’s office for that information.

Votes on listed resolutions and procedural motions were recorded by roll call; no recorded votes on these items were negative.