Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

South Side Residents Oppose Cemetery Development Amid Tax Revenue Concerns

October 02, 2025 | San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

South Side Residents Oppose Cemetery Development Amid Tax Revenue Concerns
Concerns over a proposed cemetery development in San Antonio's District 3 dominated the City Council's Zoning and Land Use Session on October 2, 2025. Residents and local leaders voiced strong opposition, citing three main issues: loss of tax revenue, oversaturation of cemeteries, and negative impacts on property values.

One resident highlighted that Service Corporation International (SCI), the company behind the cemetery proposal, has not paid over $1.1 million in property taxes for its existing Sunset Memorial Park over the past four years. This raises alarms about the potential loss of revenue for the city and local school districts if the new cemetery is approved, especially as the city grapples with a budget shortfall.

With 250 cemeteries already within a five-mile radius, community members argued that the proposed site is unnecessary. They pointed out that existing cemeteries, including San Jose Burial Park and Mission Burial Park South, have ample capacity for future needs. Furthermore, with cremation rates projected to rise to 80% by 2045, the demand for new burial plots is diminishing.

Residents also expressed concerns about property values, noting that cemeteries can lead to decreased demand and lower resale values in surrounding areas. The South Side, already facing economic challenges, needs developments that provide essential services like grocery stores and medical clinics, rather than a cemetery that does not meet these urgent community needs.

The opposition was further fueled by SCI's controversial history, including a $29 million settlement for deceptive practices in Florida and violations of California's advertising laws. Community members questioned whether allowing such a corporation to operate in their neighborhood would be in the best interest of local residents.

As the council deliberates, the stakes are high. Approving the rezoning request could mean sacrificing millions in tax revenue and essential services for the community, while denying it could pave the way for more beneficial developments that align with the needs of District 3 residents. The council's decision will be crucial in determining the future of this rapidly growing area.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Texas articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI