In a pivotal meeting held on September 29, 2025, the Washington House State Government & Tribal Relations Committee delved into the state's approach to federal funding and data sharing, particularly in relation to immigration enforcement. The atmosphere was charged with a sense of urgency as lawmakers discussed the implications of federal requirements on state resources and the protection of immigrant communities.

A key focus of the discussion was the state's commitment to not using agency resources to assist federal civil immigration enforcement. This stance is part of a broader strategy to limit data collection and sharing to what is strictly necessary for legal compliance and federal funding requirements. Notably, Medicaid emerged as a significant example, with the state receiving approximately $26 billion in federal resources for the 2023 biennium. Lawmakers emphasized that while the state could opt out of Medicaid, doing so would jeopardize essential support for many Washington residents.

The committee highlighted the importance of maximizing federal funding for various programs, as directed in the state’s operating budget. There were at least 11 instances where agencies were instructed to leverage federal funds, underscoring the delicate balance between compliance and safeguarding residents' privacy. The Governor's office, in collaboration with the Attorney General, is actively reviewing data-sharing practices to ensure they align with state values and legal obligations.

In a significant move, the Governor recently signed an executive order establishing an immigration sub-cabinet. This initiative aims to address concerns raised by community advocates and ensure that state agencies work closely with legal and privacy experts. The sub-cabinet will focus on a range of issues, including data privacy and healthcare, and will regularly engage with community members to incorporate their perspectives into policy decisions.

Additionally, the meeting touched on the ongoing challenges posed by federal attempts to condition grant funding on the state's involvement in immigration enforcement. Washington has consistently contested these provisions in court, achieving favorable rulings that deem such requirements unlawful.

As the meeting concluded, it was clear that Washington's approach to federal funding and immigration enforcement is not just a matter of policy but a reflection of its commitment to protecting the rights and privacy of all its residents. The discussions set the stage for continued advocacy and legal scrutiny as the state navigates the complexities of federal requirements while striving to uphold its values.