Sedona City Council members are facing scrutiny over agenda-setting procedures following a public forum where residents voiced concerns about transparency and decision-making. During the meeting on August 12, 2025, Doug Fitzpatrick, a resident of Oak Creek, raised issues regarding his attempts to have a matter concerning the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) placed on the council agenda. Fitzpatrick expressed frustration over the mayor's communication, which he interpreted as dismissive of his concerns.

Fitzpatrick highlighted that, according to city rules, only a collective of three council members can place items on the agenda, and he felt that the mayor's unilateral decision to exclude his issue was inappropriate. He urged the council to consider his proposal and allow for a public discussion, emphasizing the need for transparency in the council's operations.

In response, Mayor and council members acknowledged Fitzpatrick's concerns but maintained that they had not received further interest from other council members regarding the agenda item. The discussion prompted a request for legal clarification on the council's response limitations during public forums, underscoring the procedural complexities at play.

Another resident, Tim Perry, also took the opportunity to address the council, criticizing the city's recent implementation of anti-panhandling signs. Perry's remarks reflect ongoing community debates about local policies and their impact on residents.

The meeting highlighted the importance of open communication between the council and the public, as well as the need for clear processes in agenda-setting. As the council moves forward, it will be crucial to address these concerns to foster a more inclusive and responsive governance structure in Sedona.