The Hays County government meeting on August 12, 2025, featured significant public commentary regarding the use of Flock cameras for surveillance. The session began with a brief introduction by the commissioners, who acknowledged the importance of the topic at hand.

During the public comment segment, Nathan Pino, a criminologist and Texas State University professor, voiced strong opposition to the proposed purchase of additional Flock cameras. Pino argued that these cameras infringe on civil liberties, particularly the First and Fourth Amendments, by enabling mass surveillance without proper oversight. He highlighted concerns about the potential misuse of data collected by these cameras, which could be accessed by various entities, leading to violations of privacy and civil rights.

Pino further criticized the effectiveness of Flock cameras in reducing crime, citing methodological flaws in studies that claim significant crime reduction rates. He emphasized that criminals often adapt by avoiding areas with surveillance, rendering the cameras ineffective. Additionally, he raised alarms about the financial implications, suggesting that funds allocated for surveillance could be better spent on community needs such as employment and health services.

The meeting concluded with a call for the county to reconsider its stance on Flock cameras, urging officials to prioritize civil liberties and community welfare over surveillance measures. The discussion underscored the ongoing debate about balancing public safety with individual rights in Hays County.