In a recent meeting of the San Antonio Historic and Design Review Commission, discussions centered around a contentious demolition request for an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) that has been deemed structurally unsound. The owner, Mitzi Sandell, presented her case, highlighting significant safety concerns regarding the deteriorating condition of the building, which she described as having rotting wood, a caving roof, and failing electrical systems. Sandell emphasized the economic hardship she faces, as the property has been on the market since September without any viable offers due to its condition.
The commission members expressed a mix of concern and caution regarding the demolition request. Some members were hesitant to approve the demolition without first conducting a site visit to assess the interior condition of the ADU. This visit was proposed to ensure that the claims of structural unsoundness were valid and to gather more information before making a final decision. The commission typically requires thorough documentation and often conducts site visits for such requests, especially when safety and preservation are at stake.
Despite the urgency expressed by Sandell regarding her financial situation, the commission ultimately decided to prioritize due diligence. A motion was made to allow the Design Review Committee to conduct a site visit, which was seconded and approved. This decision reflects the commission's commitment to balancing the need for preservation with the realities of economic hardship faced by property owners.
The outcome of the site visit, scheduled for the following week, will play a crucial role in determining the future of the ADU. If the commission finds the building to be as unsafe as claimed, it may lead to a more favorable outcome for Sandell. However, if the structure is deemed salvageable, it could complicate her plans to move forward.
This case highlights the ongoing challenges faced by property owners in historic neighborhoods, where the preservation of architectural integrity often clashes with the practicalities of maintaining aging structures. The commission's decision to conduct a site visit underscores the importance of thorough evaluation in the face of economic pressures, ensuring that both community safety and individual hardships are taken into account. The next steps will be closely watched as they could set a precedent for similar cases in the future.