Design Review Board Approves Controversial Seacove Drive Project Despite Neighbors' Privacy Concerns

July 26, 2025 | Laguna Beach, Orange County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Design Review Board Approves Controversial Seacove Drive Project Despite Neighbors' Privacy Concerns
The Design Review Board of Laguna Beach convened on July 24 to discuss a contentious project at 31731 Seacove Drive, which has sparked significant community debate over privacy and neighborhood compatibility. This meeting marked the third hearing for the proposed development, which includes the conversion of a garage into living space, the addition of two new lower levels, and a new two-car garage, alongside a sizable deck and swimming pool.

The project has faced scrutiny from neighbors concerned about the potential impact on their privacy and views. During the meeting, Heather Steven, a city staff member, outlined the project’s revisions, which included reducing the deck size by 70 square feet and removing a fire pit, in response to previous feedback from the board. The landscaping plan was also adjusted to retain existing hedges and introduce new Carolina cherry trees to enhance privacy.

Despite these modifications, several residents voiced strong opposition. Jim Burns, a neighbor, expressed concerns that the elevated deck would intrude on the privacy of his home, particularly his bedroom. Other residents echoed similar sentiments, arguing that the proposed deck size and height would disrupt the neighborhood's character and lead to increased visibility into their homes.

The applicant's architect, David Parker, defended the project, stating that the design had been adjusted to address privacy concerns while still allowing for reasonable development of the property. He emphasized that the proposed deck is smaller than existing structures in the area and argued that the project would not significantly impact the neighborhood's dynamics.

Board members engaged in a lengthy discussion, weighing the need for development against the community's concerns. Some members expressed support for the project, citing the applicant's efforts to accommodate feedback, while others remained skeptical about the deck's size and its implications for neighborhood privacy.

Ultimately, the board's decision will hinge on balancing the applicant's rights to develop their property with the community's desire for privacy and neighborhood integrity. The ongoing discussions reflect broader themes of development and community standards in Laguna Beach, highlighting the challenges of maintaining neighborhood character amid evolving residential needs. The board is expected to deliberate further on the project in upcoming meetings, as residents continue to advocate for their concerns.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Comments

    Sponsors

    Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Family Portal
    Family Portal