Senator questions government's use of eminent domain after 25 years of inaction

June 16, 2025 | 2025 Legislature, Virgin Islands


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Senator questions government's use of eminent domain after 25 years of inaction
A heated debate erupted during the June 16, 2025, meeting of the Committee on Disaster Recovery, Infrastructure, and Planning in the US Virgin Islands Legislature, centering on the controversial use of eminent domain for public projects. Lawmakers expressed strong concerns about the government's accountability in utilizing properties taken under this authority, particularly when projects remain unfulfilled for decades.

One senator passionately argued against halting ongoing projects, emphasizing that eminent domain should only be a last resort. "We have to take this property to build that school," they stated, highlighting the community's needs. However, they also criticized the government for failing to deliver on promises made 25 years ago, questioning the ethics of repurposing land intended for public use into parking lots or other non-essential developments.

The senator raised alarms about the potential for government overreach, stating, "If you can't show us that in 25 years you have done nothing significant... we should not be sitting here embarrassing ourselves." This sentiment resonated with other committee members, who echoed the need for transparency and accountability in how public land is managed.

Discussions also touched on the importance of defining "public use" to prevent misuse of eminent domain powers. One member suggested that the government should not be allowed to repurpose land after a quarter-century of inactivity, arguing that such actions could lead to the exploitation of residents.

The meeting concluded with a consensus on the necessity of establishing clear criteria for public use and ensuring that the government remains answerable to the community it serves. As the committee moves forward, the implications of these discussions could reshape how eminent domain is applied in the territory, aiming to protect residents' rights while addressing public needs.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Comments