Peachtree City Council reviews options for new pool structure amidst repair concerns

Peachtree City officials are grappling with the future of the Kedron Pool facility as they consider options for replacing its aging air-supported structure. During a recent City Council work session, discussions centered on the current bubble's deteriorating condition and the potential costs associated with various replacement options.

The existing structure, installed in February 2012, is nearing the end of its life expectancy, prompting city staff to explore alternatives. The current bubble has required numerous repairs, costing approximately $20,000 annually in labor for installation and removal. With nearly 16,000 users last year—70% of whom are Peachtree City residents—the need for a reliable and efficient facility is clear.

City staff presented several options for replacement, ranging from another air-supported structure to more permanent solutions. The first option involves a similar air-supported structure, estimated to cost around $1.5 million, including additional civil work and engineering. However, this option would still require annual installation and removal, leading to ongoing labor costs.

A second option discussed was a permanent structure with a retractable roof, which could provide better air quality and sunlight. This option is projected to cost between $2.9 million and $3.2 million, excluding additional infrastructure costs. A third option, a Dynadome structure, has a budgetary quote of $2.55 million but also lacks comprehensive cost estimates for necessary site work.

The fourth option, which garnered significant interest from council members, involves a structure from Sprung Structures, estimated to cost between $1.6 million and $2 million. This option promises a 50-year lifespan and could potentially utilize existing foundations, saving on construction costs. Council members expressed a desire for more information on this option, particularly regarding its design and additional features like roll-up doors for ventilation.

In addition to the structural discussions, the council addressed a pressing issue: a significant leak in the existing pool, losing up to 7,000 gallons of water daily. A leak detection test is set to cost $3,000, and the council is weighing whether to address this issue alongside potential structural changes.

As the council deliberates, they recognize the financial implications of these decisions. The current budget does not allocate funds for these projects, and discussions about potential bond issues to finance the improvements are underway. Council members emphasized the importance of providing a quality facility for residents, balancing the need for immediate repairs with long-term investments.

The council plans to continue exploring the options, focusing on the fourth proposal, and aims to gather more detailed cost estimates and design plans before making a final decision. The outcome of these discussions will significantly impact the community's recreational offerings and the management of taxpayer resources.